Ever since someone first asked me in that multi-layered tone meant to convey interest and mask competitivenes: "so, Eleanor's 10 months and not walking yet?" I stifled that "my kids must be the best and the smartest or it means I'm a failure" feeling and tried out the new motto "By the time she's 21, I'm sure she'll know how to walk. And your kid will too." And that's all it means. It's not about me.
Okay so I have my own personal list of goals on my fridge but recently as a mom I've been more aware of conflicting goals in situations with my children. What is more important? Their agency (i.e. pursuit of happiness) or my goal at the time (clean table, low energy bills, my nap, my pride).
For instance, I have a goal for my children to love reading. I model good reading habits, I read out loud to them, I have worked alongside Eleanor to learn the basic phonetic rules of English. Now, I know Eleanor (5) can sound out words, quite complicated words sometimes (shotgun, pioneer, buccaneer). However, she absolutely refuses to read on command. Or to herself.
I've been wrestling with what to do and my mom asked a good question. "What does it MEAN if Eleanor doesn't read?" I was about to splutter "It means I'm not a good homeschooler, I'm not a good mom, she'll Fall Behind, she's dumb....but wait, I know she's not. And darnit, I know I'm not any of those things. Those are all my insecurities talking. So I took a deep breath, and said "It means, uh, it means she just isn't reading right now." So for now, we're just reading lots of good books and cutting back on the TV. Other good ideas from my husband and mom were: She acts out stories as I read them (this worked well with Thumbelina), we do a reader's theater, comic books, let her draw while I read, and read in different places (like a tent or under the bunkbed with a lamp), and write her simple love notes that she can decipher.